August 23rd 2023



Our objections to demolition of 82 Wentworth Park Rd
- Accommodation is needed now. Refurbishment at a cost of $2M would make 27 dwellings available in less time than a demolish and rebuild at a cost of $21.7M. This means more supply more quickly to address the public housing shortage.
- Pollution. The site – once occupied by a paint factory from the 1930s – contains contaminants that pose a risk to neighbouring households.
- Environmental damage. The Royal Institute of British Architects points out that “if developers replace an existing building with a new one, vast amounts of CO2 are created to make the bricks, cement and steel for the replacement. If instead they can renovate the existing building, emissions are greatly reduced.”
- In-fill preferred. Currently sophisticated town planners and architects are favouring renovation and in-fill rather the brutal demolition and rebuild. This current trend even reached the conservative magazine Domain (SMH 5/8/23). Yet the LAHC continues to argue for the outmoded policy of demolish and rebuild.
- Alternative strategies to demolition. The Glebe Society has provided the Minister with an alternative proposal, being a refurbish and in-fill scheme for a total of 52 bedrooms at $14M compared to the projected $21.7M for 53 bedrooms under the current plan.
Strong community support against demolition exists.
